Membership committee
For the membership committee: every file complete, every decision on record
The committee needs complete files, a review it can share without emailing attachments, and a decision trail that survives the next election.
SOL · 12 · 01
What usually goes wrong
- 01
Half the applications are missing a document or a referee.
- 02
The committee reviews in an email thread with attachments nobody can find later.
- 03
Approval is a decision; the membership, the invoice and the welcome are three more tasks.
SOL · 12 · 02
The modules that matter here
AMS · 02
Applications & vetting
Required documents and referees enforced by the form, stages with reviewer seats, a needs-information loop, dossier PDFs, approval that onboards.
AMS · 01
Membership CRM
Reviewer seats see only their applications; the decision trail stays on the member record.
AMS · 04
Member portal
The approved member activates the portal from the welcome email.
SOL · 12 · 03
A season with SupaGuild
- Submission
The form refuses an incomplete file; referees receive their link; the application lands in “received”.
- Review
Reviewers read the dossier, add notes, send it back for information if needed, pass it to the committee stage.
- Decision
Approval creates the membership, the joining invoice and the portal invitation; rejection sends your message and archives the file.
Questions
Membership committee
01Can we vote on an application?
The committee stage records each reviewer’s recommendation and note; the decision is taken by the role your statute names. A formal ballot on an application uses the governance module.
02Can applicants see the referees’ answers?
No. References are visible to reviewers only.
Related solutions